A Food Security Initiative to Contribute
to Effective
Community Response to Globalization
�REGIONAL UPDATE
1.0�
��PROJECT BRIEF
1.1�
RATIONALE /CONTEXT
Issues affecting food security in
the Asian region made the Project highly significant. Reality shows that despite
tremendous growth for the past two decades, the region is still home to more
than 800 million people living in poverty.� In East Asia, for instance, where the average GDP growth is
more than 6% in the last 15 years (1980-94), more than 450 million people are
still earning less than US$ 1 per day (WB, 1994).�
More so, the importance and urgency in addressing food security in Asia
has been highlighted with the financial crisis in the second half of 1997 which
makes the condition even more difficult for the poor.� GDPs of many East Asian countries are even projected to be
negative and is expected to severely affect food security of Asian countries.�
Small-scale farmers and the rural and urban poor in developing Asia will
be hit hardest by long-term declines in income level.
It
is hoped that with the 200-Village food security initiative, ANGOC, its
membership and the grassroots communities will be able to develop and act upon
food security issues locally and formulate significant policies influencing
national and regional level, as a contribution to poverty and hunger alleviation
efforts under today�s globalization trends.
The
Project was initially conceived to monitor and determine the extent to which
World Food Summit (WFS, 1996) commitments have been achieved at the community
level, where it matters most.� It
was one of the recommendations in the Joint
ANGOC-FAO Follow-up Workshop on Cooperation in the Implementation of the WFS
Plan of Action (Bangkok, 1997). This entails selecting key food security
variables which are measurable and which could be compared and aggregated at the
national and regional levels.
The Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC), as a constituency-based network has engaged in conducting village surveys during its 20-year existence as a network.� Similar regional and local activities in the past include the i) 1977-79 village-level pre-WCARRD consultations; ii) 20-village survey per country done in 1983-84 to monitor the WCARRD follow-up covering 10 countries; iii) the preparatory work for UNCED involving national consultations with over 500 NGOs in Southeast Asia; and iv) the five-year Asian Development Forum involving national and regional consultations. � 1.2�
�OBJECTIVES
The general objective of the Project is to assess
food security at the household and community level as the basis for
community-level planning and action and policy advocacy at the national and
regional level.� Specifically, the
objectives of the Project are as follows:
i)������������������
to develop a framework showing the interrelationship of fundamental
factors affecting food security at the household and community level;
ii)����������������
to develop and implement methodologies and skills for utilizing the
above indicators as the basis for community-level planning and action by the
local NGOs and the communities themselves;
iii)��������������
to enable the grassroots communities to participate more effectively in
identifying food related problems, plan actions to solve these problems, and to
monitor progress in food security in the community level, through Participatory
Rural Appraisal (PRA) techniques;
iv)��������������
to utilize the obtained data as basis for linking local action with
ANGOC�s policy work with local and national governments and international
agencies;
v)����������������
to encourage discussions and create opportunities to establish favorable
policy environment in promoting food security;
vi)��������������
to advance effective knowledge transfer and experience sharing among the
ANGOC networks and strengthen the capacities of Southern NGOs, and;
vii)������������
to� promote and help attain
food security among the selected villages.
In achieving the above-interrelated objectives, the
Project attempts to promote rethinking and influence the shift of the dominant
concept and practice of food security as espoused by government and
international agricultural institutions.
�1.3� PROJECT SCOPE�
AND METHODOLOGY�
The Project covers 10
Asian countries (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Nepal,
Philippines, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand) from where the 200 representative
villages will be selected� (20
villages per country).��
The Project consists of
three phases (Baseline Survey and Community Planning, Project Implementation and
Policy Advocacy) and covers three years.� A
set of criteria will guide the selection of villages in each country.�
With this, it is expected that varied yet comprehensive information about
food security situation in the region will be generated through participatory
data collection methodologies.� As
such, the identification of community action plans and the direction of policy
advocacy/dialogues will be guided and defined by the actual situations reflected
by the results.� Households and villages, who are reflective of the
implications of national and regional policies and programs on food security,
are considered as the unit of analysis.�
Criteria for the selection of villages:
��������
it must be relatively small� (i.e composed of 200-500 households), homogenous and
accessible
�������� it must have the capacity to generate demonstrative effect �������� preferably, it has existing food security initiatives �������� preferably, it has been included in the Asian Development Forum processes and the ANGOC 1983 Village Survey (WCARRD) ��������
preferably, it has good rapport and linkages with other agencies
and communities
1.4�
KEY� ACTIVITIES
The Project is developed with
the idea that food security can best be measured at the household and village
level and that its status is reflected by the combined effect of various factors
or key indicators. This idea serves as the initial framework from which the
Project proceeds.� Table
1 enumerates the key and specific indicators, assumptions and variables
considered significant in assessing the status of food security. The actual
nature and direction of relationship of these factors will form the framework
noted as the first Project objective.
Likewise, the Project aims to
map out significant interventions in the community, which help promote food
security.� In this sense, a
framework will be developed from the nature and pattern of community
interventions of the existing NGOs, POs and government line agencies, as well.
1.4.1�
�Establishing Mechanism for
Sustained and Impact-Oriented Actions
Throughout the Project
implementation, a mechanism will be established to develop favorable link
between the grassroots communities and the policy environment. This mechanism
will provide venue for all development efforts especially where micro and macro
linkages would help ensure sustained and impact-oriented actions.
1.4.2�
�Baseline Survey
Baseline survey
consists of data gathering from the household, community and national level.�
The Household Survey Questionnaire, Community Profiling Guide and the
National Food Security Situationer are the three types of data collection
instruments designed for each level, respectively.�
Below are brief description of the instruments and the general guidelines
in administering them.
i)�
Household Survey Questionnaire�
The household questionnaire is composed of the i)
household profile;� ii)
household purchasing power;� iii) household expenditure pattern;� iv) food
acquisition, distribution and consumption; v)
housing and facilities; vi) household
health status; vii) food production viii)
level of community participation; ix) perception
on food security indicators, and;� x) community problems. Qualified respondents could be the male or
female head of the household or the eldest sibling.� In the process, any or all of them could sit in the
interview.� Thirty (30) households
will represent each selected village for the survey.� Sample households will be selected randomly.�
Guidelines will be provided to Country Focal Points (CFPs) on the random
sampling technique that will be adopted in the study.�
This data gathering instrument is to be accomplished by the enumerators
from local NGO partners with the supervision of the CFP.
ii)� Community
Profiling Guide�
The community profiling guide contains information
about the village�s�� i)
natural features;� ii)
socio-demographic characteristics;� iii) basic social services;� iv)� economic activities;�
v)�
basic household and community facilities;�
vi)�
environmental management;� vii) social organization, and; viii)
community issues and problems. The information required in this guide shall be
obtained from both primary and secondary sources through participatory
approaches.� Sources may include key
informant interviews, focus group discussion, and ocular inspection and line
agencies among others.� The local
NGO partners will take the lead in community profiling process with the
supervision of the Country Focal Point (CFP).
iii)� National
Food Security Situationer
The National Food Security Situationer outlines the
basic information for a general assessment of national food security status.�
Secondary information on the following are required at the national
level: i) country profile; ii) demography
iii) economy; iv) land use pattern; v)
land ownership structure; vi) national
policies affecting agriculture vii) social
services;� viii) role and participation of women, and; ix) NGO intervention.� This
data-gathering instrument is to be accomplished by the Country Focal Point (CFP)
mostly through secondary sources.�
1.4.3�
Community Projects
Projects addressing food security will be identified by the
communities themselves based primarily on the community planning and baseline
survey outcome.� Project
implementation is the second phase of the 200-Village Project.
1.4.4�
Policy Advocacy
Policy advocacy, as another major component is a
continuing process throughout the Project.�
It is however, highlighted in the third phase where the outcome of
baseline survey and community project are processed and analyzed and which will
set specific agenda for policy dialogues.��
Food security monitor, process documentation, PRA processes and case
studies are activities, which will be undertaken across Project phases and will
form part of the policy advocacy processes.
1.5�������
�PROJECT MANAGEMENT
At the regional level ANGOC board of directors and
the secretariat take the lead in Project management with the help of the Project
Advisory Committee (PAC) and the Technical Working Group (TWG), especially
formed for the Project operation.� On
the other hand, the Country Focal Points (CFPs) take the lead at the national
level in coordination with local NGO Partners and the South-South Placements
Volunteers.� The CFPs are mainly
ANGOC members in selected countries covered by the Project.
2.0�
PROJECT STATUS
2.1�
COUNTRIES INCLUDED AND PROJECT FOCAL POINTS
The Project is now operational in seven countries and
has covered about 139 villages out of the target 200.�
The countries include Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Pakistan,
Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.� ADAB,
AVARD, BINA SWADAYA, RDF, PhilDHRRA, NNGOC and RRAFA act as Country Focal Points
(CFPs) in each country respectively.� In
addition, other ANGOC members in some countries are also involved in the Project
as coordinated by the CFP.� In
India, AIRD, GPF, CARTE, CORT/FORRAD, MYRADA and SARRA are actively involved in
the Project while BINA DESA and KPA in Indonesia.
2.2�
ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED
Table 2 shows
the status of the Project Baseline Survey (Phase I) as of August 1999, which
consists mainly of the household survey, community profiling and preparation of
the national food security situationer.� Also
listed are the activities conducted, as described below.
2.2.1� National
Meetings/Workshops
The
national meeting led by the Country Focal Points (CFPs) was a major activity to
formally begin the national-level implementation of the 200-Village Project.
With the national meeting, the CFP and the local NGO partners were expected to
have common understanding of the overall process involved in the Project.
Furthermore, it helped assess the capacity of the NGOs to carry out their role
in the Project and come up with an efficient and effective approach in Project
operationalization.
General Objectives :
1.
��� to
consult and orient the local NGO partners about the Project
2.
��� to
assess capability and needs of local NGO partners to implement the Project
3.
��� to
formulate national action plan of CFP in consultation with local NGO partners
Specific
Objectives :
1.
��� to
orient the participants on the following
��������
200-Village
Project Concept
��������
Project
components and methodology
��������
Project
management scheme
2.
��� to
identify/finalize the list of sample villages��
3.
��� to
identify local NGO partners to work on each selected village
4.
��� to
define cost-sharing scheme
5.
��� to
present and examine the content of the data collection instruments (household
survey questionnaire and� community
profiling guide) to prepare local NGO work plan for the conduct of the baseline
survey in their assigned village(s).
This was held in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan.�
Others like Indonesia and Sri Lanka combined the National Meeting and the
Training.�� For countries such as India and Indonesia, where more
than one organization are involved in the country-level implementation, smaller
meetings of Project partners were held prior to the National Meeting.
Philippines on the other hand started with a National Food Security Conference.�
2.2.2.�����
Pre-testing of Household Questionnaire
The household survey questionnaire prepared by the TWG
was pre-tested in each country to assess applicability in the local
community.� The questionnaire was
revised accordingly by the CFPs to capture country-specific conditions.�
This resulted to several sets of questionnaire with minor differences for
each country.
2.2.3�
In-Country Training / Investigators� Training
A
major preparatory activity for the baseline survey and community planning
component of the 200-Village Project where all participating NGOs (local NGO
partners) in the Project were convened to discuss specific project design and
methodology. Participants were representatives of the local NGO partners who
actually conducted/supervised the survey. Major topics discussed were the survey
instruments specifically its development (food security operational definition,
indicators and variables) and administration (�how to�).��
Revisions
on the instruments based on participants� experience in gathering local data
were also considered.� Some
incorporated pre-testing (actual interview) in this activity.�
2.2.4�
National Food Security Conference
In the Philippines, this Conference was held to begin
the process where representatives from NGOs, GOs, POs and academe were convened
to discuss national food security in the current regional/global situation.�
2.2.5�
Household Survey
Thirty (30) households represented each selected
village during the survey.� In most
villages sample households were selected randomly as proposed in the Project
methodology.� However, significant
considerations led the CFPs to adopt purposive sampling procedure. For instance,
sampling selection was confined with households below poverty line, or small
farmers in some of the villages.� Specific
sampling procedure adopted in each village will be carefully considered in the
analysis.�
Community profiling and the preparation of national
food security situationer were done simultaneously with the household survey.
2.2.6�
PRA Training
It is a major approach in the overall project
process, particularly in community profiling and planning.�
This involved training/workshop on various PRA techniques useful in
gathering especially the community-level information and in project planning.
Most of the CFPs incorporated their discussions on
this in the in-country training while some had a separate workshop to learn the
process.
2.2.7�
Village Meetings/Workshop
This was intended to present/validate gathered
information at the village level� (survey
and profiling) and also, for community planning for possible food security
projects/interventions in the community or to gather additional information.�
2.3�
REGIONAL ACTIVITIES
2.3.1� Formation of Project
Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group
Initially, the Project Advisory Committee (PAC) and
the Project Technical Working Group were formed by June 1998 composed of
representatives from the following institutions.
�����������
Project
Advisory Committee� (PAC)
1.�� Mr. A.Z.M.�
Obaidullah Khan
2.
��� Bishop
Antonio J. Ledesma, S.J.
3.
��� Dr.�
Percy E. Sajise
Technical Working Group
(TWG)
1.
��� Mr.
Virander K. Sibal�
2.
��� Dr.
Gil Saguiguit Jr.
3.
��� Prof.�
Marideth Bravo
4.
��� Ms.�
Rachel Polestico�
5.�� Fr.
Francis Lucas
2.3.2�������
Development of Project Design and Methodology
Through a series of TWG meeting, the Project design and methodology including the
baseline survey instruments (as described above) were finalized. Pre-testing of
the household questionnaire was also conducted in selected rural Barangays in
Infanta, Quezon, Philippines.�
2.3.3�
First Regional Meeting
The first Regional Meeting was held last 01-04
December 1998 in Bangkok. The meeting was focused on the 200-Village Project
process and methodology and backed up by the MIS (Management Information System)
Training. It was participated by nine (9) NGO networks from eight (8) Asian
countries.� Some members of the TWG
and Technical Staff from the Regional Office of the FAO-RAP, also attended
the Meeting as resource persons.�
The main objectives of the Meeting were :
i)��
to� consult
and orient the Country Focal Points (CFPs) of the Project
ii)�
to enhance the capability of CFPs to�
implement the Project
iii) to
develop an efficient information exchange among partners
Several outputs generated were as follows:
i)�������
finalization of key Project activities for Phase I
ii)�����
food security indicators
iii)���
revised data gathering instruments
iv)���
manual on field survey and data gathering processes
v)�����
hands-on training on Internet and e-mail technology
vi)���
agreement to promote and establish link between the 200-Village Project
Country Focal Points and FAO Country Representatives regarding the
implementation of the Project
vii)�
draft action plan per country for the implementation of the baseline
survey and on internet connectivity and advocacy
2.3.4�
Database Development
A Database System was developed for encoding and
processing of data from the household survey.�
A consultant from the Institute of Statistics, University of the
Philippines at Los Ba�os (INSTAT, UPLB) was contracted for three (3) months to
develop the System.� The System was
especially developed to capture the minor variations in the survey questionnaire
used in each country.�
2.3.5�������
Data Processing and Analysis Training
It was held last 04 and 05 October, 1999 in Tagaytay
City, Philippines.� The primary
objective of the Training is to equip CFPs with skills and technology in
processing and analysis of the household survey data within national and
regional-level context, since first level analysis will be done at the national
level.� This will also enable the
CFPs and local NGO partners to access and make use of the data for local
projects/activities.�
Technical person in-charge of data processing and analysis from each CFP attended the Training.� Each CFP was given a copy of the Database System together with the User�s Guide and the Guides for Data Analysis. The work plan of activities in preparation for next year�s Regional Meeting, where baseline survey results will be presented, was also drafted during the Training. |