OVERVIEW:

Agrarian Reforms in Asia

compiled by
Antonio B. Quizon & Teresa Debuque

Introductory note

This report has been prepared as a briefing tool for participants to the WCARRD 20/20 Conference (ANGOC: 6-7 October 1999, Tagaytay, Philippines). It summarizes data from secondary & tertiary sources, and draws mainly from studies previously prepared by Asian NGOs for their assessments.

CONTENTS

  • OVERVIEW 1: A Review of the Peasants Charter (WCARRD)
  • OVERVIEW 2: Other UN-Related International Agreements on Agrarian Reform
  • OVERVIEW 3: The Asian Agrarian Context
  • OVERVIEW 4: Land Reform Policies in Selected Asian Countries
  • OVERVIEW 5: A Review of Land Reforms in Asia
  • OVERVIEW 6: Examining some future agendas for agrarian reform in Asia

  • (The complete paper is available from the ANGOC network. Please contact ANGOC for copies.)


    OVERVIEW 3:

    The Asian Agrarian Context

    Overall agrarian structure

    Majority of Asian countries remain essentially agrarian.

    Wide differences in agrarian structure exist across, and within Asian countries . Nevertheless, countries can be classified into three broad categories, based on their dominant agrarian structures :

    1. Countries where collectivization of agriculture has been practiced, with equitable distribution of resources and a large segment of the population involved in production. Gradually being opened to forces of the market.
    Vietnam, China, North Korea, Kampuchea
    1. Countries that have undergone agricultural modernization and some level of land reforms, with a lesser segment of the population directly involved in agriculture.
    Japan, China, South Korea
    1. Countries where traditional patterns exist with a feudal or semi-feudal character, with lands held by absentee owners or corporations and which are increasingly exposed to forces of the market & modernization. A large portion of the population is involved in production, mostly in subsistence agriculture.
    most countries of South & Southeast Asia

    South & Southeast Asia:

    some essential features & trends

    • Poverty widespread (esp in South Asia) & remains largely rural. Some 2/3 of the world’s 800M in poverty in Asia.
    • Agriculture remains the main provider of employment

    (21% to 93% in the various SA & SEA countries)

    Region/ Country

    % of labor in agriculture(1997)

    per capita arable land available
    (in has., 96-97)

    Asia

    56.8

    0.50

    Bangladesh

    58.6

    0.24

    India

    61.0

    0.66

    Nepal

    93.3

    0.30

    Pakistan

    48.4

    0.84

    Sri Lanka

    46.4

    0.52

    Cambodia

    71.2

    0.98

    China

    68.5

    0.27

    East Timor

    82.5

    0.21

    Indonesia

    50.4

    0.64

    Japan

    4.8

    1.34

    Korea, North

    32.4

    0.52

    Korea, South

    12.0

    0.72

    Laos

    77.0

    0.44

    Malaysia

    21.0

    4.24

    Philippines

    41.4

    0.78

    Thailand

    58.8

    0.99

    Vietnam

    68.6

    0.25

    • Highly complicated systems of tenancy & sub-tenancy.
      • remnants of colonial & feudal systems
      • sharecropping, wage systems, leaseholds, labor tenancy, bonded labor, family labor systems
    • Land as determinant of power relationships
    • Gradual reduction in farm size, due to:
      • population density & pressure; parcelling of landholdings
      • competing land use w/ urbanization & industrialization
      • skewed land ownership patterns
    • "some ¾ of all Asian farming households no longer have enough land at their disposal to live at subsistence level."
      (gtz, 1998)
    • Options for expanding land under cultivation increasingly limited, without affecting ecological balance.
    • Growing land disputes & conflicts.
    • Expansion from land to resource conflicts (water rights; access to pastures, fishing grounds & forestlands; homelots)
    • Growing number of landless & near-landless
    • Complex & overlapping legal systems
      • conflicting policies/ priorities on land
      • state vs customary laws; large numbers of indigenous populations
    • Land ownership patterns: "small & skewed" :
    BANGLADESH 26 per cent of agricultural lands is owned by only 5% of landowners, and this class of owners hold a little over three hectares each. On the other hand, the majority (70 per cent) each own just a little over a hectare of land (1.01 has.), and altogether own a mere 29 per cent of the country's agricultural land.
    INDIA Best characterized as smallholder because of the number of its small-size farms. From 1961 to 1981 holdings of less than a hectare increased from 51 million to 81 million, or about a million and a half per year. On the other hand, farms 10 hectares or more in size did not increase.
    NEPAL 67 per cent of the country's 10.15 million farmers own an average of 0.29 hectare each and together account for less than 18 per cent of total agricultural land. On the other hand, the big landowners, who each hold an average of 8.4 hectares, together control 37 per cent of agricultural land.
    PHILIPPINES Characterized by the coexistence of small peasant farms and large plantations. While only 3.4 per cent of all farms are larger than 10 hectares, these cover as much as a third of the total agricultural land area. On the other hand, almost two-thirds of all farms are less than three hectares in size and cover only 30 per cent of the total cultivalble area. The pattern looks even more disproportional when land distribution by type of crop planted is considered. This is due to the fact that huge corporate plantations are involved in the production of these commodities. Over half of all farms (59%) are owner operated. However, share tenancy continues to be prevalent, especially in rice and corn farms, in spite of past reform measures. Owner operated farms make up 61% of the total farm area, while 20% is characterized by share tenancy arrangements.
    SRI LANKA Over 80% of the land remains state property. Privately held lands are found mostly in the densely populated South Western sector of the country. Land owners of paddy lands classified as follows: (1) those who own and operate paddy land (owner-cultivators); (2) those who operate but do not own paddy land (tenant farmers). Only 64% own and operate paddy landholdings with an aggregate area of 819,000 acres, or 67.5 % of the total paddy area.

    In the Upper North provinces, over 50% of households have holdings of less than a hectare, while 31 per cent own even less (more specifically, less than 0.8 hectare) and are considered "near-landless". In 1988 about three million hectares, or 12.7 per cent of the country's agricultural land were being farmed by tenant farmers.

      Go to top of page

    OVERVIEW 5:

    A Review of Land Reforms in Asia

    Overall issues cited:

    • Conflicting macro-economic policies & priorities that conflict with objectives of land/asset reform
      • use & exploitation of public concessions
      • policy on foreign ownership of land
      • neglect & development bias against agriculture
    • Lack of political will:
      • lack of legal framework for pursuing reforms
      • resistance by political & economic interest groups
      • non-implementation of existing laws
    • Lack of transparency & participation; governance
    • Land speculation & market forces
    • Conflicts of existing policies & priorities with customary laws, rights, access & use.

    Go to top of page

     

    OVERVIEW 6:

    Examining some future agenda

    for agrarian reform in Asia

    • Still addressing access to land & land tenure security; landlessness
    • Responding to growing need for creating new opportunities for non-farm rural employment
    • Addressing growing issues of resource tenure (land tenure à to include asset reform & resource tenure & access.
    • "Internationalizing" issues of land policy and agrarian reform.
    • Linking land (tenure) reforms with food security, poverty alleviation & environmental objectives.
    • Linking land (tenure) reforms with economic development objectives.
    • Building capacity (empowerment) for resolving land conflicts esp at local level.
    • Addressing legal & institutional reforms.
    • Building local farmer/ community capacities for self-help.
    • Examining & addressing market forces that impact on land markets
    • Addressing emerging issues and making informed choices in agricultural technology (rise of new seeds, patents, & new forms of technological dependency or "technological tenancy").
    • Recognizing customary land rights & customary law, within legal state systems.

    Go to top of page